September 17, 2005
For my stories I want to keep point of view limited to a few or, if possible, one character. Many of my favorite narratives stay with one character for most or all of the duration of the story. Rowling writes like this; the majority of the narrative is with Harry. Four chapters have been otherwise. Eddings wrote his Elenium trilogy never leaving Sparhawk's mind, though I don't recall much insight to his thoughts. The issue I have with Salvatore is that he changes narratives constantly, often leaving them with minor characters and, almost always, the bad guys. I had thought of doing that, but now it seems like it would rob some of the element of surprise from the story. The main characters don't know everything that's going to happen, and I don't think the reader needs to either. That was one thing I admired about McKiernan's writing (one of the few things) -- point of view didn't change. Or maybe it did and I don't remember, but it never strayed very far. Most of the writing guides I've come across discourage using point of view for minor characters, and I have to agree. If something happens elsewhere that the readers need to know about, telling it through another character's exposition is a better way to do it. That's basically what happened in the Council of Elrond chapter. It was hard to get through, sure, but in my opinion it beats jumping all over the place and getting inside the heads of characters we'll never see again.
